A comparative evaluation of reverse osmosis membrane performance when combined with anaerobic or aerobic membrane bioreactors for indirect potable reuse applications

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Huang, Yu
dc.contributor.author Jeffrey, Paul
dc.contributor.author Pidou, Marc
dc.date.accessioned 2022-11-29T10:42:38Z
dc.date.available 2022-11-29T10:42:38Z
dc.date.issued 2022-11-18
dc.identifier.citation Huang Y, Jeffrey P, Pidou M. (2022) A comparative evaluation of reverse osmosis membrane performance when combined with anaerobic or aerobic membrane bioreactors for indirect potable reuse applications, Journal of Water Process Engineering, Volume 50, December 2022, Article number 103295 en_UK
dc.identifier.issn 2214-7144
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.103295
dc.identifier.uri https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/18750
dc.description.abstract The filtration performance and fouling behaviour of reverse osmosis (RO) membranes was investigated for the post-treatment of aerobic (Ae) and anaerobic (An) MBR effluents treating municipal wastewater for potable reuse. Both MBR effluents followed by RO can produce a water quality sufficient for indirect potable water reuse, while fluorescence excitation-emission scan suggests RO can effectively remove disinfection by-products precursors, ensuring the safety for chlorine based reuse water distribution by rejecting the dissolved organic matters in MBR effluents. AnMBR effluent leads to more fouling when compared to the AeMBR effluent with an average membrane fouling resistance of 12.35 × 1013 m−1 and 8.97 × 1013 m−1. Elemental analysis and membrane surface imaging results demonstrate that the foulant deposition sequence is organic and colloidal at first, followed by inorganic substances, while TOC and Ca are the most deposited foulants from both effluents. The unremoved ammonia in the AnMBR effluent may partially go through in the RO permeate and exceed the threshold in Singapore's PUB NEWater standard, while experiencing a significantly higher deposition rate of 13.8 % than the nitrate (0.02 %) from the AeMBR effluent. The findings suggest that the combination of AnMBR with RO offers a more sustainable approach than with the AeMBR but nutrients removal, with the potential of recovery, is recommended before the RO membranes to limit the fouling propensity and achieve a permeate of sufficient quality. en_UK
dc.language.iso en en_UK
dc.publisher Elsevier en_UK
dc.rights Attribution 4.0 International *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ *
dc.subject Aerobic en_UK
dc.subject Anaerobic en_UK
dc.subject Fouling, membrane bioreactor en_UK
dc.subject Reverse osmosis en_UK
dc.subject Water reuse en_UK
dc.title A comparative evaluation of reverse osmosis membrane performance when combined with anaerobic or aerobic membrane bioreactors for indirect potable reuse applications en_UK
dc.type Article en_UK


Files in this item

The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International

Search CERES


Browse

My Account

Statistics