Multi-criteria evaluation for sorting motion planner alternatives

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Papaioannou, Georgios
dc.contributor.author Htike, Zaw
dc.contributor.author Lin, Chenhui
dc.contributor.author Siampis, Efstathios
dc.contributor.author Longo, Stefano
dc.contributor.author Velenis, Efstathios
dc.date.accessioned 2022-08-11T09:22:20Z
dc.date.available 2022-08-11T09:22:20Z
dc.date.issued 2022-07-11
dc.identifier.citation Papaioannou G, Htike Z, Lin C, et al., (2022) Multi-criteria evaluation for sorting motion planner alternatives, Sensors, Volume 22, Issue 14, July 2022, Article number 5177 en_UK
dc.identifier.issn 1424-8220
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.3390/s22145177
dc.identifier.uri https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/18302
dc.description.abstract Automated vehicles are expected to push towards the evolution of the mobility environment in the near future by increasing vehicle stability and decreasing commute time and vehicle fuel consumption. One of the main limitations they face is motion sickness (MS), which can put their wide impact at risk, as well as their acceptance by the public. In this direction, this paper presents the application of motion planning in order to minimise motion sickness in automated vehicles. Thus, an optimal control problem is formulated through which we seek the optimum velocity profile for a predefined road path for multiple fixed journey time (JT) solutions. In this way, a Pareto Front will be generated for the conflicting objectives of MS and JT. Despite the importance of optimising both of these, the optimum velocity profile should be selected after taking into consideration additional objectives. Therefore, as the optimal control is focused on the MS minimisation, a sorting algorithm is applied to seek the optimum solution among the pareto alternatives of the fixed time solutions. The aim is that this solution will correspond to the best velocity profile that also ensures the optimum compromise between motion comfort, safety and driving behaviour, energy efficiency, journey time and riding confidence. en_UK
dc.description.sponsorship Innovate UK: EP/N509450/1 en_UK
dc.language.iso en en_UK
dc.publisher MDPI en_UK
dc.rights Attribution 4.0 International *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ *
dc.subject automated vehicles en_UK
dc.subject motion planning en_UK
dc.subject sorting alternatives en_UK
dc.subject motion sickness en_UK
dc.subject safety en_UK
dc.subject energy efficiency en_UK
dc.subject journey time en_UK
dc.title Multi-criteria evaluation for sorting motion planner alternatives en_UK
dc.type Article en_UK


Files in this item

The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International

Search CERES


Browse

My Account

Statistics