A holistic risk management framework for renewable energy investments

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Abba, Yahajja Zara Ibrahim
dc.contributor.author Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye
dc.contributor.author Hart, Phil
dc.date.accessioned 2022-03-13T20:38:40Z
dc.date.available 2022-03-13T20:38:40Z
dc.date.issued 2022-03-04
dc.identifier.citation Abba ZY, Balta-Ozkan N, Hart P. (2022) A holistic risk management framework for renewable energy investments, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Volume 160, May 2022, Article number 112305 en_UK
dc.identifier.issn 1364-0321
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112305
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/17651
dc.description.abstract Private investments are critical enablers to achieving energy access for over 770 million people worldwide. Despite decreasing capital costs, investments in renewable energy (RE) projects in developing countries are low due to unattractive risk-return profiles. Through understanding key risks drivers and their interactions, actionable insights can be drawn to mitigate investment risks, making energy more accessible. This paper reviews RE risks and methods used for risk assessment and mitigation for developed and developing countries with a focus on Sub-Saharan Africa countries (SSA). The review finds that while risk analysis and evaluation mainly employed semi-quantitative multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) and system dynamics (SD) methods for developing countries, qualitative methods were used to identify mitigations. The methods assessed technical and economic risks at a minimum, while MCDA and SD methods can assess social, political, and policy risks. The efficacies of mitigations were tested using SD and quantitative methods such as agent-based modelling and Monte Carlo simulation. The paper further introduces a ‘holistic multi-dimensional investor risk management framework’ which can be used to identify actions to improve investment risks in a structured manner. The framework addresses four fundamental limitations observed in the existing literature, recognising that RE risks are complex and involve multidisciplinary perspectives having interactions and feedbacks with other risks, actors, and their actions. This review provides a valuable reference to investors, policymakers, and researchers, providing a catalogue of risks, methods deployed in literature, including a framework to identify impactful actions to improve risk levels. en_UK
dc.language.iso en en_UK
dc.publisher Elsevier en_UK
dc.rights Attribution 4.0 International *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ *
dc.subject Renewable energy investment risks en_UK
dc.subject Renewable energy risk assessment methods en_UK
dc.subject Multicriteria decision analysis en_UK
dc.subject System dynamics en_UK
dc.subject Agent-based modelling en_UK
dc.subject Monte Carlo simulation en_UK
dc.subject Developing countries en_UK
dc.subject Sub-sahara africa countries en_UK
dc.subject Holistic risk management framework en_UK
dc.subject Analytical hierarchy process en_UK
dc.subject Analytical network process en_UK
dc.title A holistic risk management framework for renewable energy investments en_UK
dc.type Article en_UK


Files in this item

The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International

Search CERES


Browse

My Account

Statistics