Measuring mental workload using physiological measures: a systematic review

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Charles, Rebecca L.
dc.contributor.author Nixon, Jim
dc.date.accessioned 2019-11-06T11:51:44Z
dc.date.available 2019-11-06T11:51:44Z
dc.date.issued 2018-09-13
dc.identifier.citation Charles R and Nixon J. (2019) Measuring mental workload using physiological measures: a systematic review. Applied Ergonomics, Volume 74, January 2019, pp. 221-232 en_UK
dc.identifier.issn 0003-6870
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.08.028
dc.identifier.uri https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/14683
dc.description.abstract Technological advances have led to physiological measurement being increasingly used to measure and predict operator states. Mental workload (MWL) in particular has been characterised using a variety of physiological sensor data. This systematic review contributes a synthesis of the literature summarising key findings to assist practitioners to select measures for use in evaluation of MWL. We also describe limitations of the methods to assist selection when being deployed in applied or laboratory settings. We detail fifty-eight peer reviewed journal articles which present original data using physiological measures to include electrocardiographic, respiratory, dermal, blood pressure and ocular. Electroencephalographic measures have been included if they are presented with another measure to constrain scope. The literature reviewed covers a range of applied and experimental studies across various domains, safety-critical applications being highly represented in the sample of applied literature reviewed. We present a summary of the six measures and provide an evidence base which includes how to deploy each measure, and characteristics that can affect or preclude the use of a measure in research. Measures can be used to discriminate differences in MWL caused by task type, task load, and in some cases task difficulty. Varying ranges of sensitivity to sudden or gradual changes in taskload are also evident across the six measures. We conclude that there is no single measure that clearly discriminates mental workload but there is a growing empirical basis with which to inform both science and practice. en_UK
dc.language.iso en en_UK
dc.publisher Elsevier en_UK
dc.rights Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ *
dc.subject Mental workload en_UK
dc.subject Taskload en_UK
dc.subject Physiological measures en_UK
dc.subject Systematic review en_UK
dc.title Measuring mental workload using physiological measures: a systematic review en_UK
dc.type Article en_UK
dc.identifier.cris 21479987


Files in this item

The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Search CERES


Browse

My Account

Statistics