Multispectral image analysis approach to detect adulteration of beef and pork in raw meats

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ropodi, Athina
dc.contributor.author Pavlidis, Dimitrios
dc.contributor.author Mohareb, Fady R.
dc.contributor.author Panagou, Efstathios
dc.contributor.author Nychas, George
dc.date.accessioned 2019-08-23T09:26:21Z
dc.date.available 2019-08-23T09:26:21Z
dc.date.issued 2019-08-08
dc.identifier.citation Ropodi AI, Pavlidis DE, Mohareb F, et al., (2015) Multispectral image analysis approach to detect adulteration of beef and pork in raw meats. Food Research International, Volume 67, January 2015, pp. 12-18 en_UK
dc.identifier.issn 0963-9969
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.10.032
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/14463
dc.description.abstract The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of multispectral imaging supported by multivariate data analysis for the detection of minced beef fraudulently substituted with pork and vice versa. Multispectral images in 18 different wavelengths of 220 meat samples in total from four independent experiments (55 samples per experiment) were acquired for this work. The appropriate amount of beef and pork-minced meat was mixed in order to achieve nine different proportions of adulteration and two categories of pure pork and beef. After an image processing step, data from the first three experiments were used for partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) so as to discriminate among all adulteration classes, as well as among adulterated, pure beef and pure pork samples. Results showed very good discrimination between pure and adulterated samples, for PLS-DA and LDA, yielding 98.48% overall correct classification. Additionally, 98.48% and 96.97% of the samples were classified within a ± 10% category of adulteration for LDA and PLS-DA respectively. Lastly, the models were further validated using the data of the fourth experiment for independent testing, where all pure and adulterated samples were classified correctly in the case of PLS-DA, while LDA was proved to be less accurate. en_UK
dc.language.iso en en_UK
dc.publisher Elsevier en_UK
dc.rights Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ *
dc.title Multispectral image analysis approach to detect adulteration of beef and pork in raw meats en_UK
dc.type Article en_UK
dc.identifier.cris 5614120


Files in this item

The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Search CERES


Browse

My Account

Statistics