Abstract:
The thesis explores the magnitude and determinants of spinoff value effects using
robust methodologies and different theoretical perspectives. From a sample of 170
European spinoffs in the period 1987-2005, I find that spinoff announcement returns
are significantly positive while the long-run shareholder value performance of postspinoff
firms is insignificant when the cross-sectional return dependence problem is
controlled. This is consistent with market efficiency overall in relation to spinoffs.
However, this overall efficiency may conceal irrational investor behaviour towards
certain types of spinoffs.
Assuming investor irrationality, I examine whether investor sentiment affects spinoff
wealth effects and spinoff decisions. I use four different proxies to measure investor
demand for corporate focus and glamour stocks, and observe a positive association
between these proxies and spinoff announcement returns. In addition, I find that
offspring, born of spinoffs to cater to investor demand for glamour stocks,
significantly underperform various benchmarks including the performance of less
glamourous offspring.
An improvement in operating efficiency of post-spinoff firms may not be realised if
post-spinoff firms have weak corporate governance and agency conflicts are not
mitigated. I investigate this issue by examining changes of corporate governance
mechanisms around spinoffs. I observe that spinoff firms with a controlling family
shareholder have higher announcement stock returns but lower post-spinoff
performance than others. Moreover, controlling family shareholders generally reduce
their stock ownership in post-spinoff firms, indicating that they may undertake
spinoffs to reshuffle their wealth portfolios. I also find that board monitoring and
takeover threats for post-spinoff firms positively affect the long-run performance of
post-spinoff firms.
This thesis further inspects the relationship between information asymmetry between
the pre-spinoff parent and the stock market, and spinoff value effects. By employing
four different information asymmetry proxies, I find no evidence that a spinoff
resolves information asymmetry problems. In contrast, I document some evidence that
the information asymmetry problem may be exacerbated following spinoffs when the
liquidity of post-spinoff firms is decreased.
Taken together, my findings suggest that managers and shareholders should assess the
desirability of a spinoff more carefully and take investor irrationality into account.
This is the first study that focuses on European spinoffs over a long period and tests
various theories concerning the sources of value. It also provides the first time
empirical evidence on the validity of the catering theory in the context of spinoffs.