On-board compressor water injection for civil aircraft emission reductions: range performance with fuel burn analysis

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Block Novelo, David Alejandro
dc.contributor.author Igie, Uyioghosa
dc.contributor.author Nalianda, Devaiah
dc.date.accessioned 2019-01-18T10:41:08Z
dc.date.available 2019-01-18T10:41:08Z
dc.date.issued 2019-01-03
dc.identifier.citation Block Novelo DA, Igie U, Nalianda D. (2019) On-board compressor water injection for civil aircraft emission reductions: range performance with fuel burn analysis. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Volume 67, February 2019, pp. 449-463 en_UK
dc.identifier.issn 1361-9209
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.12.021
dc.identifier.uri https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/13832
dc.description.abstract The performance benefit of compressor water injection for a stand-alone jet engine has been investigated in previous work conducted by the authors, as well as other studies. For the same required thrust, the benefits include reduced specific fuel consumption, turbine inlet temperature and NOx emissions. The additional weight implication for aircraft (narrow and wide-body type) with their typical engine type (two and three-spool) for the varied range is investigated here. The emphasis of this study is to establish whether the performance benefit restricted to take-off and parts of the climb, offsets the additional weight penalty of the water injection system, onboard the aircraft. An in-house aircraft performance tool has been used and the changes in performance due to water injection are determined by an evaporation model previously developed. This study shows that the shortest range of 4 missions offers small overall fuel savings of 0.42% per flight cycle. The longest mission, in which the injection equipment is carried for longer (though mostly empty water tank), brings about an overall increase in fuel consumed, by about 0.05%. For the same range, the aircraft powered by a three-spool engine shows better performance. However, both aircraft equally benefit from landing and take-off NOx emission reductions of around 43%. Water Injection is shown to result in similar performance benefits as 25% take-off derate but without the penalties in fuel burn or increased take-off and climb times. Reductions in turbine inlet temperature obtained are worth considerable attention as a means of decreasing the direct operating costs of an airline. en_UK
dc.language.iso en en_UK
dc.publisher Elsevier en_UK
dc.rights Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ *
dc.subject NOx emissions en_UK
dc.subject Aircraft performance en_UK
dc.subject Emissions reductions en_UK
dc.subject Water injection en_UK
dc.subject Derated take-off en_UK
dc.title On-board compressor water injection for civil aircraft emission reductions: range performance with fuel burn analysis en_UK
dc.type Article en_UK


Files in this item

The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Search CERES


Browse

My Account

Statistics