dc.contributor.author |
Brooker, Peter |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2007-01-05T16:04:23Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2007-01-05T16:04:23Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2006-10 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Peter Brooker Air Traffic Control Safety Indicators: What is Achievable? Eurocontrol: Safety R&D Seminar 25-27 October 2006, Barcelona Spain |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/1826/1372 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
European Air Traffic Control is extremely safe. The drawback to this safety
record is that it is very difficult to estimate what the ‘underlying’ accident rate for mid-air
collisions is now, or to detect any changes over time. The aim is to see if it possible to
construct simple ATC safety indicators that correlate with this underlying accident rate. A
perfect indicator would be simple to comprehend and capable of being calculated by a
checklist process. An important concept is that of ‘system control’: the ability to
determine the outcome against reasonably foreseen changes and variations of system
parameters. A promising indicator is ‘Incident Not Resolved by ATC’, INRA, incidents
in which the ground ATC defences have been ‘used up’. The key question is: if someone
says he or she knows how to make a good estimate of the underlying accident rate, then
how could this claim be tested? If it correlates very well with INRA, then what would be
the argument for saying that it is a better indicator? |
en |
dc.format.extent |
335127 bytes |
|
dc.format.mimetype |
application/pdf |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.publisher |
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation |
en |
dc.title |
Air Traffic Control Safety Indicators: What is Achievable? |
en |
dc.type |
Postprint |
en |