The Influences on Direct Communication in British and Danish Firms: Country, 'Strategic HRM' or Unionization?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Croucher, R -
dc.contributor.author Gooderham, P -
dc.contributor.author Parry, Emma -
dc.date.accessioned 2011-05-31T23:12:06Z
dc.date.available 2011-05-31T23:12:06Z
dc.date.issued 2006-11-01T00:00:00Z -
dc.identifier.citation Richard Croucher, Paul Gooderham, Emma Parry. The Influences on Direct Communication in British and Danish Firms: Country, ‘Strategic HRM’ or Unionization? . European Journal of Industrial Relations, Volume 12, Number 3 (November 2006), pp. 267-286, en_UK
dc.identifier.issn 0959-6801 -
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/1358
dc.description.abstract This paper examines the antecedents of private sector managers’ propensity to communicate directly to employees in Britain and Denmark by use of largescale survey data. It tests Brewster’s (1995) argument that European HR managers are constrained in applying American versions of HRM and considers other theories suggesting that companies in the two countries would have different drivers of their communications practices. It is also relevant to ‘varieties of capitalism’ discussions of how national systems structure firm-level behaviours. It finds two antecedents for managers’ propensity to communicate directly, irrespective of country: whether the senior HR manager is involved in 3 strategy formation and the degree of unionisation. These are common to companies operating in both Britain and Denmark and it is therefore concluded that Brewster’s argument must to that extent en_UK
dc.language.iso en_UK en_UK
dc.publisher Sage Publications en_UK
dc.title The Influences on Direct Communication in British and Danish Firms: Country, 'Strategic HRM' or Unionization? en_UK
dc.type Article en_UK


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search CERES


Browse

My Account

Statistics