Clogging vs. fouling in immersed membrane bioreactors

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Buzatu, Pompilia
dc.contributor.author Qiblawey, Hazim
dc.contributor.author Odai, A.
dc.contributor.author Jamaleddin, J.
dc.contributor.author Nasser, Mustafa
dc.contributor.author Judd, Simon J.
dc.date.accessioned 2018-07-17T14:22:20Z
dc.date.available 2018-07-17T14:22:20Z
dc.date.issued 2018-07-09
dc.identifier.citation Buzatu P, Qiblawey H, Odai A, et al., (2018) Clogging vs. fouling in immersed membrane bioreactors. Water Research, Volume 144, November, 2018, pp. 46-54 en_UK
dc.identifier.issn 0043-1354
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.07.019
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/13345
dc.description.abstract Whilst the fouling of MBR membrane surfaces has been very extensively explored by the academic community, there is an increasingly widespread recognition by practitioners of the issue of clogging of membrane channels with sludge solids, sometimes termed “sludging”. The study undertaken has quantified this phenomenon using a bespoke test cell allowing a flat sheet membrane channel to be viewed directly during operation and the accumulated solids determined by digital image processing. Sludging behaviour has then been correlated both with the sludge properties, from sludge samples taken from both an industrial and municipal MBR, and the permeability decline rate data. The work has revealed the expected trends in fouling propensity, as quantified by the exponent n of the Δp/Δt = m.exp(nJ) correlation from classical flux-step tests. With zero membrane aeration the industrial samples exhibited sludging, the filling of the complete thickness of the membrane channel with sludge solids, whereas for municipal sludge the solids formed a cake layer which did not fill the channel. In the absence of sludging the permeability decline followed the expected pattern of increasing at the elevated soluble COD and capillary suction time values of the industrial sludge, compared with municipal sludge at the same solids concentration range (8–12 g.L−1). However, there was no evident correlation between fouling (permeability decline without sludging) and sludging: incipient sludging did not appear to influence permeability, though can be assumed to negatively impact on long-term operation, or relate to the sCOD concentration. Sludging instead appeared to depend on the sludge physical properties, and primarily the viscosity: sludge samples at high viscosities were found to exhibit a different air-scour pattern to that at normal MLSS concentrations. Outcomes suggest that sludging is caused by rheological conditions promoting bubble coalescence and bubble stream constriction, reducing the exposure of the membrane surface to scouring air. en_UK
dc.language.iso en en_UK
dc.publisher Elsevier en_UK
dc.rights Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ *
dc.subject Membrane bioreactors en_UK
dc.subject Sludge en_UK
dc.subject Clogging en_UK
dc.subject Sludging en_UK
dc.subject Fouling en_UK
dc.subject Rheology en_UK
dc.title Clogging vs. fouling in immersed membrane bioreactors en_UK
dc.type Article en_UK


Files in this item

The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Search CERES


Browse

My Account

Statistics