A restatement of the natural science evidence concerning catchment-­based 'natural' flood management in the UK

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Holman, Ian P.
dc.date.accessioned 2017-03-20T14:22:41Z
dc.date.available 2017-03-20T14:22:41Z
dc.date.issued 2017-03-15
dc.identifier.citation Dadson et al., A restatement of the natural science evidence concerning catchment-­based 'natural' flood management in the UK. March 2017, Volume 473, Issue 2199 en_UK
dc.identifier.issn 1364-5021
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2016.0706
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/11623
dc.description.abstract Flooding is a very costly natural hazard in the UK and is expected to increase further under future climate change scenarios. Flood defences are commonly deployed to protect communities and property from flooding, but in recent years flood management policy has looked towards solutions that seek to mitigate flood risk at flood-prone sites through targeted interventions throughout the catchment, sometimes using techniques which involve working with natural processes. This paper describes a project to provide a succinct summary of the natural science evidence base concerning the effectiveness of catchment-based ‘natural’ flood management in the UK. The evidence summary is designed to be read by an informed but not technically specialist audience. Each evidence statement is placed into one of four categories describing the nature of the underlying information. The evidence summary forms the appendix to this paper and an annotated bibliography is provided in the electronic supplementary material. en_UK
dc.language.iso en en_UK
dc.publisher The Royal Society en_UK
dc.rights Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. Information: No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
dc.title A restatement of the natural science evidence concerning catchment-­based 'natural' flood management in the UK en_UK
dc.type Article en_UK


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search CERES


Browse

My Account

Statistics