Assessment of activated sludge, membrane bioreactors and vertical flow wetlands for upgrading sewage treatment works

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Le Corre Pidou, Kristell
dc.contributor.author Dotro, Gabriela
dc.contributor.author Jefferson, Bruce
dc.date.accessioned 2017-02-22T15:34:51Z
dc.date.available 2017-02-22T15:34:51Z
dc.date.issued 2016-11-29
dc.identifier.citation A. Besançon, K. S. Le Corre, G. Dotro & B. Jefferson, Assessment of activated sludge, membrane bioreactors and vertical flow wetlands for upgrading sewage treatment works. Environmental Technology, Volume 38, 2017 - Issue 2: 6th International Symposium on Wetland Pollutant Dynamics and Control (WETPOL) and the Annual Conference of the Constructed Wetland Association, pp154-162 en_UK
dc.identifier.issn 0959-3330
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2016.1260642
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/11476
dc.description.abstract This paper demonstrates that utilising a vertical flow (VF) wetland after a conventional activated sludge (CAS) delivers equivalent or better effluent quality to a membrane bioreactor (MBR) based on a side-by-side pilot trial. The CAS was operated under the solids retention times (SRT) of 6, 12, and 20 days, with the effluent from each pilot plant fed onto a soil aquifer treatment column to better understand their water reuse application potential. Results showed an upgraded CAS + VF system could deliver effluents with median values of 34 mgO2.L–1, 7 mg.L–1 and 1.9 mg.L–1 for organics, solids and ammonia nitrogen, respectively, which were statistically similar to those from the MBR. Water reuse standards were achieved by the upgraded system for most parameters, with the exception of total coliform removal. The upgraded system delivered superior metal removal when compared to the CAS. An economic analysis showed upgrading a CAS with a VF wetland was more favourable than investing in an MBR system for example works of 5000 and 50,000 population equivalents if the VF system was operated at hydraulic loading rates of 0.03 m.d–1 and 0.08 m.d–1, respectively. This was delivered for a tenth of the carbon footprint of the MBR treatment. en_UK
dc.language.iso en en_UK
dc.publisher Taylor & Francis en_UK
dc.rights Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subject Water reuse en_UK
dc.subject Solids en_UK
dc.subject Nitrification en_UK
dc.subject Metals en_UK
dc.subject Aquifer recharge en_UK
dc.title Assessment of activated sludge, membrane bioreactors and vertical flow wetlands for upgrading sewage treatment works en_UK
dc.type Article en_UK


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

Search CERES


Browse

My Account

Statistics