dc.description.abstract |
Geotextiles are used by engineers for a variety of applications, such as filtration,
separation, slope stabilisation, drainage and soil erosion control. At present, there is
little research on geotextiles for erosion control, despite the increase in their use in the
field. There are no guidelines for soil conservationists or field/civil engineers to
indicate which product will be most effective for any given site. Studies that do exist
tend to be qualitative and descriptive, rather than quantitative and scientific. There is
also very limited identification and understanding of the salient physical properties of
erosion control geotextiles.
The present laboratory experiments aim to contribute objective, scientific data. These
experiments evaluate the performance of seven different erosion control geotextiles.
The products are selected to be representative of the types of erosion control
geotextile currently on the market. The products tested are four natural fibred
products, including three woven bionets and one biomat. Three synthetic geomats are
also tested: two are buried and one is installed on the soil surface. A bare soil plot is
used as the control in all the tests. The experiments are designed to simulate erosion
processes at the sub-process level. This is achieved by simulating rainsplash and
overland flow, both separately, and in combination. Experimental variables used
include rainfall intensity (35 mm/hr, 95 mm/hr and 115 mm/hr), overland flow rate
(40 ml/sec) and soil type (sandy loam and clay loam). Runoff volume, infiltration
volume and soil loss are collected for each experimental run. From the results of these
tests, it is possible to indicate how geotextiles modify incoming rainfall and surface
hydrology, and therefore affect rates of soil detachment and transport.
The results show that erosion control effectiveness is influenced by the physical
characteristics of the geotextiles tested, soil type and rainfall intensity. The products
tested have insignificant effect on runoff volumes generated, but soil loss varies
considerably for the different treatments. Overall, the natural, woven products
Rickson, R.J. 2000
Cranfield
UNIVERSITY
perform most effectively, reducing soil loss significantly when compared with the
bare soil control, for all experimental conditions tested. The buried, synthetic products
were not as efficient at controlling soil loss: under some experimental conditions soil
loss from these treatments was even greater than that observed for the bare soil
control.
The results are analysed in terms of the salient properties of the geotextiles, which
explain their performance. The salient properties identified were: percentage ground
cover provided by the geotextile, water holding capacity, Geotextile Induced
Roughness, wet weight of geotextile and ability to increase overland flow depth.
The limitations of the laboratory-based research are indicated, such as the problems of
extrapolation from small test plots up to field scale applications, and the difficulties of
controlling the interactions between the geotextiles and the experimental variables.
Implications of the research to the erosion control industry are made. For existing and
potential end-users of erosion control geotextiles, the decision to specify these
products is not only related to technical performance (as quantified in the laboratory
studies), but also to the assessment of erosion risk, costs and compliance criteria. For
manufacturers, identification of the salient properties of effective erosion control
geotextiles helps in the development and design of improved products.
Recommendations for future research include study of the variability in geotextile
performance as related to external factors such as soil type, rainfall intensity, slope
steepness and slope length. Incorporating the effect of erosion control geotextiles into
physically based erosion prediction models such as EUROSEM and WEPP has great
potential. Identification and quantification of critical values of the salient properties
of erosion control geotextiles has considerable scope. The performance of geotextiles
at controlling erosion over longer time periods (greater than one storm event) requires
further investigation. Finally, research into the synergistic relationships between
geotextiles and vegetation also warrants further research. |
en_UK |