Sustainable landfill leachate treatment using refuse and pine bark as a carbon source for biodenitrification

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Frank, R. R.
dc.contributor.author Trois, C.
dc.contributor.author Coulon, Frederic
dc.date.accessioned 2016-10-27T14:45:00Z
dc.date.available 2016-10-27T14:45:00Z
dc.date.issued 2014-12-17
dc.identifier.citation Frank, R. R., Trois, C., Coulon, F. (2014) Sustainable landfill leachate treatment using refuse and pine bark as a carbon source for biodenitrification. Environmental Technology, Vol. 36, Iss. 11, pp1347-1358 en_UK
dc.identifier.issn 0959-3330
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2014.989279
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/10892
dc.description.abstract Raw and 10-week composted commercial garden refuse (CGR) materials and pine bark (PB) mulch were evaluated for their potential use as alternative and sustainable sources of carbon for landfill leachate bio-denitrification. Dynamic batch tests using synthetic nitrate solutions of 100, 500 and 2000 mg NO3 L−1 were used to investigate the substrate performance at increasing nitrate concentrations under optimal conditions. Further to this, sequential batch tests using genuine nitrified landfill leachate with a concentration of 2000 mg NO3 L−1 were carried out to evaluate substrates behaviour in the presence of a complex mixture of chemicals present in leachate. Results showed that complete denitrification occurred in all conditions, indicating that raw and composted CGR and PB can be used as sustainable and efficient media for landfill leachate bio-denitrification. Of the three substrates, raw garden refuse yields the fastest denitrification rate followed by 10-week composted CGR and PB. However, the efficiency of the raw CGR was lower when using genuine leachate, indicating the inhibitory effect of components of the leachate on the denitrification process. Ten-week composted CGR performed optimally at low nitrate concentrations, while poor nitrate removal ability was found at higher nitrate concentrations (2000 mg L−1). In contrast, the PB performance was 3.5 times faster than that of the composted garden refuse at higher nitrate concentrations. Further to this, multi-criteria analysis of the process variables provided an easily implementable framework for the use of waste materials as an alternative and sustainable source of carbon for denitrification. en_UK
dc.language.iso en en_UK
dc.publisher Taylor & Francis en_UK
dc.rights This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Environmental Technology on 17/12/2014, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09593330.2014.989279.” en_UK
dc.rights Attribution-Non-Commercial 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC 3.0) You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. Information: Non-Commercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. en_UK
dc.subject Denitrification en_UK
dc.subject Leachate treatment en_UK
dc.subject Carbon source en_UK
dc.subject Pine bark en_UK
dc.subject Commercial garden refuse en_UK
dc.title Sustainable landfill leachate treatment using refuse and pine bark as a carbon source for biodenitrification en_UK
dc.type Article en_UK


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search CERES


Browse

My Account

Statistics