Exergetic, exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analysis of intercooled gas turbine engine

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Almutairi, Abdulrahman S.
dc.contributor.author Pilidis, Pericles
dc.contributor.author Al-Mutawa, Nawaf
dc.date.accessioned 2016-10-19T13:47:28Z
dc.date.available 2016-10-19T13:47:28Z
dc.date.issued 2016-07-01
dc.identifier.citation Abdulrahman S. Almutairi, Pericles Pilidis, and Nawaf Al-Mutawa. "Exergetic, Exergoeconomic and Exergoenvironmental Analysis of Intercooled Gas Turbine Engine", 52nd AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, Propulsion and Energy Forum, (AIAA 2016-5060) en_UK
dc.identifier.isbn 978-1-62410-406-0
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-5060
dc.identifier.uri https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/10784
dc.description.abstract Exergetic and exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses have been performed for an advanced aero-derivative intercooled gas turbine engine. The proposed system was modelled using the IPSEpro software package and validated using manufacturer’s published data. The exergoeconomic model evaluates the cost-effectiveness of the gas turbine engine based on the Specific Exergy Costing [SPECO] method. The CO2 emissions per KWh were estimated using a generic combustor model, HEPHAESTUS, developed at Cranfield University. It is well known that the exergetic analysis can determine the magnitudes, locations and types of losses within an energy system. The effect of load and ambient temperature variations on gas turbine performance were investigated for two different configurations. The first system, Case-I, was a simple gas turbine (SCGT) engine, and the second, Case-II, an intercooling gas turbine (ICGT) system. The latter enhances gas turbine efficiency but, at the same time, has an adverse effect on the combustion chamber due to reduced compressed air temperature. It was confirmed that full load and low ambient temperature are preferable due to the low waste exergy. The unit exergy cost rate for both SCGT and ICGT have been calculated as 8.59 and 8.32 US$/GJ respectively. The exergoenvironmental results show the ICGT achieved lower emission levels and is more environmentally friendly than the SCGT. en_UK
dc.language.iso en en_UK
dc.publisher American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics en_UK
dc.rights Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subject Exergy en_UK
dc.subject Intercooled en_UK
dc.subject Gas Turbine en_UK
dc.subject Exergoeconomic en_UK
dc.subject CO2 emission en_UK
dc.title Exergetic, exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analysis of intercooled gas turbine engine en_UK
dc.type Conference paper en_UK


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

Search CERES


Browse

My Account

Statistics