dc.description.abstract |
Using the design requirements of Remotely Piloted
Vehicles
(RPV's), selected for wind tunnel
testing over
the
Reynolds number range 3 x 105 to 1 x 106. The first
aerofoil, NACA
643-418, showed a degradation of
performance in terms of
lift-to-drag ratio as the Reynolds
number was reduced. There was also a laminar
separation
bubble of notable extent on both the
upper and lower
surfaces at most incidences
throughout the Reynolds number
range.
The second
aerofoil, Göttingen 797, had good
performance in terms of
lift-to-drag ratio and maximum
lift
coefficient, even at the lowest
Reynolds number.
This was attributed to the flat bottom of the
aerofoil,
which allowed the formation of extensive laminar flow on
the lower surface without the formation of a laminar
separation bubble.
The third
aerofoil, Wortmann FX63-137, generally
exhibited the best
aerodynamic performance in terms of
maximum values of both
lift-to-drag ratio and lift
coefficient, throughout the Reynolds number range considered.
Four alternative lower surface
geometries for this aerofoil
were also tested. The modifications reduced the
maximum values of both the lift coefficient and lift-to-
drag ratio of the original aerofoil throughout the
Reynolds number range, but generally improved the lift-to-drag
ratios at low values of lift coefficient. The notable
exception was the modification which resulted in a flat
bottomed section. This had maximum values of
lift-to-drag
ratio which were within a few
percent of those of the
original aerofoil throughout the Reynolds number range.
Wind tunnel results were used to evaluate
low-speed
aerofoil
analysis computer programs written by Eppler and
Somers (13) and Van Ingen (18). The results were
disappointing. However, using the same wind tunnel
results it was noted that
computer programs using semi-inverse
viscous methods show
great promise. |
en_UK |