Comparative evaluation of GHG emissions from the use of Miscanthus for bio-hydrocarbon production via fast pyrolysis and bio-oil upgrading

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Shemfe, Mobolaji B.
dc.contributor.author Whittaker, Carly
dc.contributor.author Gu, Sai
dc.contributor.author Fidalgo Fernandez, Beatriz
dc.date.accessioned 2016-08-04T12:17:37Z
dc.date.available 2016-08-04T12:17:37Z
dc.date.issued 2016-05-13
dc.identifier.citation Mobolaji B. Shemfe, Carly Whittaker, Sai Gu, Beatriz Fidalgo, Comparative evaluation of GHG emissions from the use of Miscanthus for bio-hydrocarbon production via fast pyrolysis and bio-oil upgrading, Applied Energy, Volume 176, 15 August 2016, pp22-33 en_UK
dc.identifier.issn 0306-2619
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.04.113
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/10224
dc.description.abstract This study examines the GHG emissions associated with producing bio-hydrocarbons via fast pyrolysis of Miscanthus. The feedstock is then upgraded to bio-oil products via hydroprocessing and zeolite cracking. Inventory data for this study were obtained from current commercial cultivation practices of Miscanthus in the UK and state-of-the-art process models developed in Aspen Plus®. The system boundary considered spans from the cultivation of Miscanthus to conversion of the pyrolysis-derived bio-oil into bio-hydrocarbons up to the refinery gate. The Miscanthus cultivation subsystem considers three scenarios for soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration rates. These were assumed as follows: (i) excluding (SOC), (ii) low SOC and (iii) high (SOC) for best and worst cases. Overall, Miscanthus cultivation contributed moderate to negative values to GHG emissions, from analysis of excluding SOC to high SOC scenarios. Furthermore, the rate of SOC in the Miscanthus cultivation subsystem has significant effects on total GHG emissions. Where SOC is excluded, the fast pyrolysis subsystem shows the highest positive contribution to GHG emissions, while the credit for exported electricity was the main ‘negative’ GHG emission contributor for both upgrading pathways. Comparison between the bio-hydrocarbons produced from the two upgrading routes and fossil fuels indicates GHG emission savings between 68% and 87%. Sensitivity analysis reveals that bio-hydrocarbon yield and nitrogen gas feed to the fast pyrolysis reactor are the main parameters that influence the total GHG emissions for both pathways. en_UK
dc.language.iso en en_UK
dc.publisher Elsevier en_UK
dc.rights Attribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject Fast pyrolysis en_UK
dc.subject Biorefinery en_UK
dc.subject GHG emissions en_UK
dc.subject Bio-oil upgrading en_UK
dc.subject Miscanthus en_UK
dc.subject Life cycle assessment en_UK
dc.title Comparative evaluation of GHG emissions from the use of Miscanthus for bio-hydrocarbon production via fast pyrolysis and bio-oil upgrading en_UK
dc.type Article en_UK


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International

Search CERES


Browse

My Account

Statistics