Process modelling and techno-economic analysis of natural gas combined cycle integrated with calcium looping

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Erans Moreno, Maria
dc.contributor.author Hanak, Dawid P.
dc.contributor.author Jordi, Mir
dc.contributor.author Edward, Anthony
dc.contributor.author Manovic, Vasilije
dc.date.accessioned 2016-07-04T14:54:11Z
dc.date.available 2016-07-04T14:54:11Z
dc.date.issued 2016-07-04
dc.identifier.citation Erans María, Hanak Dawid P., Mir Jordi, Anthony Edward J., Manovic Vasilije. Process modelling and techno-economic analysis of natural gas combined cycle integrated with calcium looping. Thermal Science 2016 Volume 20, Issue suppl. 1, Pages: 59-67 en_UK
dc.identifier.issn 0354-9836
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/TSCI151001209E
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/10074
dc.description.abstract Calcium looping (CaL) is promising for large-scale CO2 capture in the power generation and industrial sectors due to the cheap sorbent used and the relatively low energy penalties achieved with this process. Because of the high operating temperatures the heat utilisation is a major advantage of the process, since a significant amount of power can be generated from it. However, this increases its complexity and capital costs. Therefore, not only the energy efficiency performance is important for these cycles, but also the capital costs must be taken into account, i.e. techno-economic analyses are required in order to determine which parameters and configurations are optimal to enhance technology viability in different integration scenarios. In this study the integration scenarios of CaL cycles and natural gas combined cycles (NGCC) are explored. The process models of the NGCC and CaL capture plant are developed to explore the most promising scenarios for NGCC-CaL integration with regards to efficiency penalties. Two scenarios are analysed in detail, and show that the system with heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) before and after the capture plant exhibited better performance of 49.1% efficiency compared with that of 45.7% when only one HRSG is located after the capture plant. However, the techno-economic analyses showed that the more energy efficient case, with two HRSGs, implies relatively higher cost of electricity (COE), 44.1€/MWh, when compared to that of the reference plant system (33.1€/MWh). The predicted cost of CO2 avoided for the case with two HRSGS is 29.3 €/ton CO2. en_UK
dc.language.iso en en_UK
dc.publisher VINČA Institute of Nuclear Sciences en_UK
dc.subject NGCC en_UK
dc.subject calcium looping en_UK
dc.subject efficiency penalty en_UK
dc.subject techno-economic analysis en_UK
dc.title Process modelling and techno-economic analysis of natural gas combined cycle integrated with calcium looping en_UK
dc.type Article en_UK


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search CERES


Browse

My Account

Statistics