Browsing by Author "Verheijen, Frank G. A."

Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Biochars in soils: towards the required level of scientific understanding
    (Taylor and Francis, 2016-12-14) Tammeorg, Priit; Bastos, Ana Catarina; Jeffery, Simon; Rees, Frédéric; Kern, Jurgen; Graber, Ellen R.; Ventura, Maurizio; Kibblewhite, Mark G.; Amaro, Antonio; Budai, Alice; Cordovil, Claudia M. D. S.; Domene, Xavier; Gardi, Ciro; Gascó, Gabriel; Horák, Ján; Kammann, Claudia; Kondrlova, Elena; Laird, David; Loureiro, Susana; Martins, Martinho A. S.; Panzacchi, Pietro; Prasad, Munoo; Prodana, Marija; Peregrina Puga, Aline; Ruysschaert, Greet; Sas-Paszt, Lidia; Silva, Flávio C.; Teixeira, Wenceslau Geraldes; Tonon, Giustino; Delle Vedove, Gemini; Zavalloni, Costanza Zavalloni; Glaser, Bruno; Verheijen, Frank G. A.
    Key priorities in biochar research for future guidance of sustainable policy development have been identified by expert assessment within the COST Action TD1107. The current level of scientific understanding (LOSU) regarding the consequences of biochar application to soil were explored. Five broad thematic areas of biochar research were addressed: soil biodiversity and ecotoxicology, soil organic matter and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, soil physical properties, nutrient cycles and crop production, and soil remediation. The highest future research priorities regarding biochar’s effects in soils were: functional redundancy within soil microbial communities, bioavailability of biochar’s contaminants to soil biota, soil organic matter stability, GHG emissions, soil formation, soil hydrology, nutrient cycling due to microbial priming as well as altered rhizosphere ecology, and soil pH buffering capacity. Methodological and other constraints to achieve the required LOSU are discussed and options for efficient progress of biochar research and sustainable application to soil are presented.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    On-farm benefits from soil organic matter in England and Wales
    (Cranfield University, 2005) Verheijen, Frank G. A.; Kibblewhite, Mark G.; Loveland, P. J. L.
    Soil organic carbon (SOC) is increasingly recognised as an important component in the global carbon cycle and as a potential C sequestration pool for mitigation of the enhanced greenhouse effect. Recent appeals have prompted research into the potential of storing C in arable fields and the concomitant impact for on-farm economics. This project was instigated to answer the question “Does soil organic matter (SOM), or its management, provide arable on-farm benefit, in England and Wales?”. A methodological design was developed which integrates social science with soil science. From the National Soil inventory (NSI) database, attainable SOC ranges were estimated for different SOC physiotopes, i.e. landscape units for which the environmental factors governing SOC contents are similar. Significant differences were found, e.g for a dry-sandy physiotope and a wet-clayey physiotope, the ranges were estimated at 0.5-1.6% and 2.0-5.4% SOC (w/w), respectively. A list of qualified ‘SOM benefit’ indicators was developed using an iterative process involving the scientific literature and interviews with ‘expert farmers’. Perceptions of the indicators were investigated within a stratified random sample of commercial farmers. On balance, farmers perceived that benefits of SOM outweighed the disbenefits (i.e. lodging, weeds, and slugs). N fertiliser reduction, increased yield quantity, and enhanced ease of tillage were recognised as the most valuable benefits. However, the values were low to moderate, and perceived to be influenced substantially by physiotope, crop type, and SOM management type. Farmers’ perceptions and valuations were investigated for 101 fields on commercial farms, selected from the NSI database to represent the attainable SOC content ranges. No correlations were found between SOC and any performance indicator. The full range of reported performances was found for fields with similar SOC contents. This implied that SOC contents and SOM management may have little importance to on-farm economics when compared to the quality of overall farm management. These results expose the marginal extent of on-farm benefits from increased SOC contents and SOM management. Implications for future research and policy are discussed.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Representativeness of European biochar research: part II – pot and laboratory studies
    (Taylor & Francis, 2017-06-28) Sakrabani, Ruben; Kern, Jurgen; Mankasingh, Utra; Zavalloni, Costanza; Zanchettin, Giulia; Bastos, Ana Catarina; Tammeorg, Priit; Jeffery, Simon; Glaser, Bruno; Verheijen, Frank G. A.
    Biochar research is extensive and there are many pot and laboratory studies carried out in Europe to investigate the mechanistic understanding that govern its impact on soil processes. A survey was conducted in order to find out how representative these studies under controlled experimental conditions are of actual environmental conditions in Europe and biomass availability and conversion technologies. The survey consisted of various key questions related to types of soil and biochar used, experimental conditions and effects of biochar additions on soil chemical, biological and physical properties. This representativeness study showed that soil texture and soil organic carbon contents used by researchers are well reflected in the current biochar research in Europe (through comparison with published literature), but less so for soil pH and soil type. This study provides scope for future work to complement existing research findings, avoiding unnecessary repetitions and highlighting existing research gaps.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Representativeness of European biochar research: Part I–field experiments
    (Taylor & Francis, 2017-06-28) Verheijen, Frank G. A.; Mankasingh, Utra; Penizek, Vit; Panzacchi, Pietro; Glaser, Bruno; Jeffery, Simon; Bastos, Ana Catarina; Tammeorg, Priit; Kern, Jurgen; Zavalloni, Costanza; Zanchettin, Giulia; Sakrabani, Ruben
    A representativeness survey of existing European Biochar field experiments within the Biochar COST Action TD1107 was conducted to gather key information for setting up future experiments and collaborations, and to minimise duplication of efforts amongst European researchers. Woody feedstock biochar, applied without organic or inorganic fertiliser appears over-represented compared to other categories, especially considering the availability of crop residues, manures, and other organic waste streams and the efforts towards achieving a zero waste economy. Fertile arable soils were also over-represented while shallow unfertile soils were under-represented. Many of the latter are likely in agroforestry or forest plantation land use. The most studied theme was crop production. However, other themes that can provide evidence of mechanisms, as well as potential undesired side-effects, were relatively well represented. Biochar use for soil contamination remediation was the least represented theme; further work is needed to identify which specific contaminants, or mixtures of contaminants, have the potential for remediation by different biochars.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Tolerable versus actual soil erosion rates in Europe
    (Elsevier, 2009-05) Verheijen, Frank G. A.; Jones, Robert J. A.; Rickson, R. Jane; Smith, C. J.
    Erosion is a major threat to soil resources in Europe, and may impair their ability to deliver a range of ecosystem goods and services. This is reflected by the European Commission's Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection, which recommends an indicator-based approach for monitoring soil erosion. Defined baseline and threshold values are essential for the evaluation of soil monitoring data. Therefore, accurate spatial data on both soil loss and soil genesis are required, especially in the light of predicted changes in climate patterns, notably frequency, seasonal distribution and intensity of precipitation. Rates of soil loss are reported that have been measured, modelled or inferred for most types of soil erosion in a variety of landscapes, by studies across the spectrum of the Earth sciences. Natural rates of soil formation can be used as a basis for setting tolerable soil erosion rates, with soil formation consisting of mineral weathering as well as dust deposition. This paper reviews the concept of tolerable soil erosion and summarises current knowledge on rates of soil formation, which are then compared to rates of soil erosion by known erosion types, for assessment of soil erosion monitoring at the European scale.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Will European soil-monitoring networks be able to detect changes in topsoil organic carbon content?
    (Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2008-10-31T00:00:00Z) Saby, N. P. A.; Bellamy, Patricia H.; Morvan, X.; Arrouays, D.; Jones, Robert J. A.; Verheijen, Frank G. A.; Kibblewhite, Mark G.; Verdoodt, A.; Üveges, J.; Freudenschuß, A.; Simota, C.
    Within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, articles 3.3 and 3.4 stipulate that some voluntary activities leading to an additional carbon (C) sequestration in soils could be accounted as C sinks in national greenhouse gas inventories. These additional C stocks should be verifiable. In this work, we assess the feasibility of verifying the effects of changes in land use or management practice on soil organic carbon (SOC), by comparing minimum detectable changes in SOC concentration for existing European networks suitable for soil monitoring. Among the tested scenarios, the minimum detectable changes differed considerably among the soil-monitoring networks (SMNs). Considerable effort would be necessary for some member states to reach acceptable levels of minimum detectable change for C sequestration accounting. For SOC, a time interval of about 10 years would enable the detection of some simulated large changes in most European countries. In almost all cases, the minimum detectable change in SOC stocks remains greater than annual greenhouse gases emissions. Therefore, it is unlikely that SMNs could be used for annual national C accounting. However, the importance of organic C in soil functions, and as an indicator of soil condition and trends, underlines the importance of establishing effective national SMNs.