Browsing by Author "Rabaey, Korneel"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access Ammonia recovery from brines originating from a municipal wastewater ion exchange process and valorization of recovered nitrogen into microbial protein(Elsevier, 2021-06-18) Guida, Samuela; Van Peteghem, Lotte; Luqmani, Ben; Sakarika, Myrsini; McLeod, Andrew; McAdam, Ewan J.; Jefferson, Bruce; Rabaey, Korneel; Soares, AnaA hollow fibre membrane contactor (HFMC), and two vacuum thermal stripping processes, a rotary evaporator (VTS) and multi-component system (MVTS) were compared for their ability to recover ammonia (NH3) from ion exchange (IEX) regeneration brines. The IEX was a 10 m3/day demonstration scale plant fed with secondary municipal wastewater. The 10% potassium chloride regeneration brine was used multiple times leading to ammonium (NH4+-N) saturation (up to 890 mg N/L). When treating the saturated IEX brine, the highest NH3 mass transfer coefficient for the HFMC, MVTS and VTS were 0.6, 0.7 and 0.1 h−1, respectively, compared to values between 1.7 and 3.5 h−1, when treating a synthetic solution. The highest NH3 recovery was obtained with the HFMC (99.8%) and the ammonium sulphate produced was characterised for impurities, presenting high quality. Concentrated ammonium (NH4+-N) solutions (0.5–3.1 g N/L) were obtained from the MVTS and VTS processes. To further valorise the recovered NH4+-N solution produced from the MVTS process, this was used as a substrate for microbial protein (MP) production. Limited differences were observed for production rate (specific growth rate 0.092–0.40 h−1), protein yield (0.021–0.18 g protein/g acetate-CODconsumed) and protein content (0.073–0.87 g protein/g cell dry weight) between recovered and commercial nitrogen (N) sources, indicating that recovered N from IEX can serve as a substrate for MP production. This study demonstrates a comprehensive N management solution for wastewater applications, leading to a range recovered products. These combined technologies can contribute to the local economy, whilst delivering to the ambitious NET-ZERO and circular economy targets.Item Open Access Membrane stripping enables effective electrochemical ammonia recovery from urine while retaining microorganisms and micropollutants(Elsevier, 2018-11-30) Christiaens, Marlies E. R.; Udert, Kai M.; Arends, Jan B. A.; Huysman, Steve; Vanhaecke, Lynn; McAdam, Ewan; Rabaey, KorneelAmmonia recovery from urine avoids the need for nitrogen removal through nitrification/denitrification and re-synthesis of ammonia (NH3) via the Haber-Bosch process. Previously, we coupled an alkalifying electrochemical cell to a stripping column, and achieved competitive nitrogen removal and energy efficiencies using only electricity as input, compared to other technologies such as conventional column stripping with air. Direct liquid-liquid extraction with a hydrophobic gas membrane could be an alternative to increase nitrogen recovery from urine into the absorbent while minimizing energy requirements, as well as ensuring microbial and micropollutant retention. Here we compared a column with a membrane stripping reactor, each coupled to an electrochemical cell, fed with source-separated urine and operated at 20 A m−2. Both systems achieved similar nitrogen removal rates, 0.34 ± 0.21 and 0.35 ± 0.08 mol N L−1 d−1, and removal efficiencies, 45.1 ± 18.4 and 49.0 ± 9.3%, for the column and membrane reactor, respectively. The membrane reactor improved nitrogen recovery to 0.27 ± 0.09 mol N L−1 d−1 (38.7 ± 13.5%) while lowering the operational (electrochemical and pumping) energy to 6.5 kWhe kg N−1 recovered, compared to the column reactor, which reached 0.15 ± 0.06 mol N L−1 d−1 (17.2 ± 8.1%) at 13.8 kWhe kg N−1. Increased cell concentrations of an autofluorescent E. coli MG1655 + prpsM spiked in the urine influent were observed in the absorbent of the column stripping reactor after 24 h, but not for the membrane stripping reactor. None of six selected micropollutants spiked in the urine were found in the absorbent of both technologies. Overall, the membrane stripping reactor is preferred as it improved nitrogen recovery with less energy input and generated an E. coli- and micropollutant-free product for potential safe reuse. Nitrogen removal rate and efficiency can be further optimized by increasing the NH3 vapor pressure gradient and/or membrane surface area.