Browsing by Author "Pearce, R."
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access Anisotropic superplasticity(College of Aeronautics, 1969-06) Naziri, H.; Pearce, R.Anisotropy has already been mentioned in connexion with SP. Johnson et al (1) have shown that specimens of circular cross-section, machined from hot-rolled SP Zn/Al eutectic and eutectoid plate, become elliptical on straining in the rolling direction, while the fine-grain Zn/Al eutectoid produced by the quench-4 spinoidal decomposition method did not.Item Open Access The effect of grain size on workhardening and superplasticity in Zn/0.4% Al Alloy(College of Aeronautics, 1969-06) Naziri, H.; Pearce, R.Superplasticity*requires, amongst other things, a metal with a grain-size in the range 0.5-5μ. Theories of SP invoking dynamic recovery require that the cell-Size of the substructure for the alloy in question is larger than the SP grain-size, so that gliding dislocations are always annihilated in the grain boundaries and workhardening cannot occur (1,2). .Thus the grain-size is critical, and for a given set of conditions, there must be a grain-size greater than which SP cannot be achieved.Item Open Access Extended plasticity in commercial-purity zinc(College of Aeronautics, 1968-09) Williams, D. A. C.; Naziri, H.; Pearce, R.90% rolling-reduction of annealed commercial-purity zinc sheet (grain size 100 - 150 μ) results in the fragmentation of the large grains into, finally, stable micro-grains, 1 - 211 in diameter. The stability of the micro-grains is due to the presence of soluble and insoluble impurities which prevent recrystallization. This micro-grain material is strain-rate sensitive, and elongations of 200% have been obtained at room temperature. Although this as-rolled, 90% reduction zinc sheet is not super-plastic according to the current definition, its behaviour has led to the coining of the phase 'extended plasticity'. Evidence of grain-boundary sliding is found on examination of the surface by scanning electron microscopy, while the examination of thin foils and activation energy measurements support the dynamic softening (recovery) theory; thus, both these mechanisms must be operating, to a greater or less extent, to confer on this material the observe mechanical behaviour. It is finally concluded that it is dangerous to draw conclusions regarding the mechanism of plastic deformation from surface observations alone.