Browsing by Author "McCabe, Leah"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access Data underpinning research article "Techno-environmental analysis of battery storage for grid level energy services"(Cranfield University, 2020-07-17 09:07) Chowdhury, Jahedul; Ozkan, Nazmiye; Goglio, Pietro; Hu, Yukun; Varga, Liz; McCabe, LeahThis file includes data from the National Grid, UK for electricity supply and demand which was modified according to the research methodology laid out in the paper here (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110018). Also, all the data needed for reproducing figures presented in the journal article are also included in the data file.Item Open Access Potentials of load-shifting with renewable energy storage: An environmental and economic assessment for the UK(US Association for Energy Econimics, 2018-09-26) Chowdhury, Jahedul Islam; Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye; Goglio, Pietro; Hu, Yukun; Varga, Liz; McCabe, LeahThe Paris Agreement set targets to limit global warming to less than 2°C above the pre-industrial level to significantly reduce the risks and impacts associated with climate change [1]. Globally, the energy supply sector is responsible for 25% of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions [2]. In addition to ratifying Paris Agreement, the UK government has adopted legally binding 80% emissions reduction target from 1990 levels by 2050 as outlined in Climate Change Act. The decarbonisation of power supply, along with electrification of heat and transport, are highlighted as key elements of this transition by both policy and academic research [3]–[5]. Storage systems, via the multiple services they offer across the electricity supply chain [6] at different operational scales stand to create system-wide benefits, enhanced flexibility and reliability for effective management of the grid [7]. The potential contributions storage systems can make towards minimizing the carbon intensity of UK grid with high levels of renewables is recognised by the government as well [8]. This study aims i) to determine the amount of load shifting that can be achieved by the combination of current renewable energy mainly wind and solar and UK grid level storage, ii) analyse the amount of renewable energy generation and storage (RES) needed to phase out programmable gas power generation during the periods of peak demand and iii) assess their economic and environmental implications. The environmental impacts considered are the life cycle emissions associated with electricity generation from the UK mix and the production, installation and use of batteries. The analysis will be extended to cover the future energy scenarios.Item Open Access Techno-environmental analysis of battery storage for grid level energy services(Elsevier, 2020-06-10) Chowdhury, Jahedul Islam; Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye; Goglio, Pietro; Hu, Yukun; Varga, Liz; McCabe, LeahWith more and more renewable energy sources (RES) going into power grids, the balancing of supply and demand during peak times will be a growing challenge due to the inherent intermittency and unpredictable nature of RES. Grid level batteries can store energy when there is excess generation from wind and solar and discharge it to meet variable peak demand that is currently supplied by combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) plants in the UK. This paper assesses the potential of battery storage to replace CCGT in responding to variable peak demand for current and future energy scenarios (FES) in the UK from technical and environmental perspectives. Results from technical analysis show that batteries, assuming size is optimised for different supply and demand scenarios proposed by the National Grid, are able to supply 6.04%, 13.5% and 29.1% of the total variable peak demand in 2016, 2020 and 2035, respectively while CCGT plants supply the rest of the demand. Particularly, to phase out CCGT variable generation from the UK grid in 2035, electricity supply from wind and solar needs to increase by 1.33 times their predicted supply in National Grid’s FES. The environmental implications of replacing CCGT by batteries are studied and compared through a simplified life cycle assessment (LCA). Results from LCA studies show that if batteries are used in place of CCGT, it can reduce up to 87% of greenhouse gas emissions and that is an estimated 1.98 MtCO2 eq. for an optimal supply, 29.1%, of variable peak demand in 2035