Browsing by Author "Keeley, James"

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Acidified and ultrafiltered recovered coagulants from water treatment works sludge for removal of phosphorus from wastewater
    (Elsevier, 2015-10-21) Keeley, James; Smith, Andrea D.; Judd, Simon J.; Jarvis, Peter
    This study used a range of treated water treatment works sludge options for the removal of phosphorus (P) from primary wastewater. These options included the application of ultrafiltration for recovery of the coagulant from the sludge. The treatment performance and whole life cost (WLC) of the various recovered coagulant (RC) configurations have been considered in relation to fresh ferric sulphate (FFS). Pre-treatment of the sludge with acid followed by removal of organic and particulate contaminants using a 2kD ultrafiltration membrane resulted in a reusable coagulant that closely matched the performance FFS. Unacidified RC showed 53% of the phosphorus removal efficiency of FFS, at a dose of 20 mg/L as Fe and a contact time of 90 min. A longer contact time of 8 h improved performance to 85% of FFS. P removal at the shorter contact time improved to 88% relative to FFS by pre-acidifying the sludge to pH 2, using an acid molar ratio of 5.2:1 mol H+:Fe. Analysis of the removal of P showed that rapid phosphate precipitation accounted for >65% of removal with FFS. However, for the acidified RC a slower adsorption mechanism dominated; this was accelerated at a lower pH. A cost-benefit analysis showed that relative to dosing FFS and disposing waterworks sludge to land, the 20 year WLC was halved by transporting acidified or unacidified sludge up to 80 km for reuse in wastewater treatment. A maximum inter-site distance was determined to be 240 km above the current disposal route at current prices. Further savings could be made if longer contact times were available to allow greater P removal with unacidified RC.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Coagulant recovery and reuse for drinking water treatment
    (Elsevier, 2015-10-21) Keeley, James; Jarvis, Peter; Smith, Andrea D.; Judd, Simon J.
    Coagulant recovery and reuse from waterworks sludge has the potential to significantly reduce waste disposal and chemicals usage for water treatment. Drinking water regulations demand purification of recovered coagulant before they can be safely reused, due to the risk of disinfection by-product precursors being recovered from waterworks sludge alongside coagulant metals. While several full-scale separation technologies have proven effective for coagulant purification, none have matched virgin coagulant treatment performance. This study examines the individual and successive separation performance of several novel and existing ferric coagulant recovery purification technologies to attain virgin coagulant purity levels. The new suggested approach of alkali extraction of dissolved organic compounds (DOC) from waterworks sludge prior to acidic solubilisation of ferric coagulants provided the same 14:1 selectivity ratio (874 mg/L Fe vs. 61 mg/L DOC) to the more established size separation using ultrafiltration (1285 mg/L Fe vs. 91 mg/L DOC). Cation exchange Donnan membranes were also examined: while highly selective (2555 mg/L Fe vs. 29 mg/L DOC, 88:1 selectivity), the low pH of the recovered ferric solution impaired subsequent treatment performance. The application of powdered activated carbon (PAC) to ultrafiltration or alkali pre-treated sludge, dosed at 80 mg/mg DOC, reduced recovered ferric DOC contamination to <1 mg/L but in practice, this option would incur significant costs. The treatment performance of the purified recovered coagulants was compared to that of virgin reagent with reference to key water quality parameters. Several PAC-polished recovered coagulants provided the same or improved DOC and turbidity removal as virgin coagulant, as well as demonstrating the potential to reduce disinfection byproducts and regulated metals to levels comparable to that attained from virgin material.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Coagulant recovery from water treatment residuals: a review of applicable technologies
    (Taylor and Francis, 2014-02-25) Keeley, James; Jarvis, Peter; Judd, Simon J.
    Conventional water treatment consumes large quantities of coagulant and produces even greater volumes of sludge. Coagulant recovery (CR) presents an opportunity to reduce both the sludge quantities and the costs they incur, by regenerating and purifying coagulant before reuse. Recovery and purification must satisfy stringent potable regulations for harmful contaminants, while remaining competitive with commercial coagulants. These challenges have restricted uptake and lead research towards lower-gain, lower-risk alternatives. This review documents the context in which CR must be considered, before comparing the relative efficacies and bottlenecks of potential technologies, expediting identification of the major knowledge gaps and future research requirements.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Coagulant Recovery from Waterworks Sludge
    (Cranfield University, 2014-10) Keeley, James; Jarvis, Peter; Judd, Simon J.
    Coagulation is a ubiquitous process in the treatment of raw surface water for eventual potable use. Despite its capabilities, the sheer scale of its use is manifested in the volumes of chemicals it demands and waste sludge it produces. Recovering and reusing the chemical activity of the coagulant sludge in water treatment is a logical solution but this practice has been restricted by the presence of contaminants within the sludge. This thesis has investigated methods that can separate the coagulant metals from these primarily natural organic contaminants, with an aim of producing a sufficiently pure coagulant for effective treatment performance when reused. A process of ultrafiltration of the impure regenerated coagulant followed by a powdered activated carbon polishing stage compared favourably to a number of other separation processes and was found to remove the most dissolved organic compounds. When the purified coagulant was used to treat raw water, it provided better turbidity removal than commercial coagulant and matched its removal of trihalomethane precursors, making the process suitable for consideration at full-scale. Analysis of the whole life cost suggested that such performance could be reproduced at full-scale within a 25 year payback period. The reuse of even purified recovered coagulants in drinking water treatment still carries risks which may deter its implementation. Therefore the efficacy of recovered coagulants in the role of phosphorus removal from wastewater was also investigated. This showed that both acidified and unacidified waterworks sludges, with sufficient contact time, could remove similar levels of phosphorus as fresh coagulants, at approximately half the whole life cost.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Reuse of recovered coagulants in water treatment: An investigation on the effect coagulant purity has on treatment performance
    (Elsevier, 2014-04-28) Keeley, James; Smith, Andrea D.; Judd, Simon J.; Jarvis, Peter
    Coagulant recovery offers many potential benefits to water treatment, by reducing chemical demand and waste production. The key obstacle to successful implementation is achieving the same levels of treatment quality and process economics as commercial coagulants. This study has evaluated the selectivity of pressure-filtration in the role of a low-cost coagulant recovery technology from waterworks sludge. The treatment performance of the purified recovered coagulant was directly compared to fresh and raw recovered coagulants. DOC and turbidity removal by recovered coagulants was close to that of commercial coagulants, indicating that coagulant can be successfully recovered and regenerated by acidifying waterworks sludge. However, performance was less consistent, with a much narrower optimum charge neutralisation window and 10–30% worse removal performance under optimum conditions. This inferior performance was particularly evident for recovered ferric coagulants. The impact of this was confirmed by measuring THM formation potential and residual metals concentrations, showing 30–300% higher THMFPs when recovered coagulants were used. This study confirms that pressure-filtration can be operated on an economically viable basis, in terms of mass flux and fouling. However, the selectivity currently falls short of the purity required for potable treatment, due to incomplete rejection of sludge contaminants.