Browsing by Author "Hurley, Paul D."
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access Barriers and enablers to uptake of agroecological and regenerative farming practices, and stakeholder views about ‘living labs’(DEFRA, 2023-02-20) Hurley, Paul D.; Rose, David Christian; Burgess, Paul J.; Staley, Joanna T.This report forms the second component of a Defra-sponsored research project entitled “Evaluating the productivity, environmental sustainability and wider impacts of agroecological compared to conventional farming systems”. The first component comprised a rapid evidence review of regenerative/agroecological farming systems. This second component describes and discusses the results of a survey to explore i) farmer and stakeholder definitions of agroecological and regenerative farming, ii) the barriers to the adoption of agroecological and regenerative farming, and iii) farmer and stakeholder views towards the concept of ‘living labs’ as a way to share research and learnings about agroecological/regenerative farming (Figure 1).Item Open Access Characterising current agroecological and regenerative farming research capability and infrastructure, and examining the case for a Living Lab network(DEFRA, 2023-12-31) Staley, Joanna T.; McCracken, Morag E.; Redhead, John R.; Hurley, Paul D.; Rose, David ChristianAgriculture is a major cause of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, biodiversity loss, and pollution. Agroecological and regenerative farming have been advocated as alternative approaches that may have fewer negative (or even net positive) environmental impacts than conventional agriculture at farm- and landscape-scales, leading to considerable interest in these approaches (Newton et al. 2020; Bohan et al. 2022; Prost et al. 2023). This report forms the third part of a Defra-funded project Evaluating the productivity, environmental sustainability and wider impacts of agroecological and regenerative farming systems compared to conventional systems. The first part of this project was a rapid evidence review of agroecological and regenerative farming systems and their impacts (Burgess et al. 2023), and the second reported interview findings to examine farmer and stakeholder perspectives on barriers and enablers in agroecological and regenerative farming (Hurley et al. 2023). This third part of the project characterised the current research capability in agroecology and regenerative farming, and explored the potential role of a new ‘living lab’ trial network.Item Open Access The impact of COVID-19 on farmers’ mental health: a case study of the UK(Taylor and Francis, 2022-11-03) Rose, David Christian; Shortland, Faye; Hall, Jilly; Hurley, Paul D.; Little, Ruth; nye, Caroline; Lobley, MattObjectives In this paper, we use a UK case study to explore how the COVID-19 pandemic affected the mental health (emotional, psychological, social wellbeing) of farmers. We outline the drivers of poor farming mental health, the manifold impacts of the pandemic at a time of policy and environmental change, and identify lessons that can be learned to develop resilience in farming communities against future shocks. Methods We undertook a survey answered by 207 farmers across the UK, focusing on drivers of poor mental health and the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic. We also conducted 22 in-depth interviews with individuals in England, Scotland and Wales who provide mental health support to farmers. These explored how and why the COVID-19 pandemic affected the mental health of farmers. These interviews were supplemented by 93 survey responses from a similar group of support providers (UK-wide). Results We found that the pandemic exacerbated underlying drivers of poor mental health and wellbeing in farming communities. 67% of farmers surveyed reported feeling more stressed, 63% felt more anxious, 38% felt more depressed, and 12% felt more suicidal. The primary drivers of poor mental health identified by farmers during the pandemic were decreased social contact, issues with the general public on private land, and moving online for social events. Support providers also highlighted relationship and financial issues, illness, and government inspections as drivers of poor mental health. Some farmers, conversely, outlined positive impacts of the pandemic. Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic is just one of many potential stressors associated with poor farming mental health and its impacts are likely to be long lasting and delayed. Multiple stressors affecting farmers at the same time can create a tipping point. Therefore, there is a need for long-term support and ongoing evaluation of the drivers of poor mental health in farming families.