Browsing by Author "Grema, Alhaji Shehu"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access Optimization of petroleum reservoir waterflooding using receding horizon approach(IEEE, 2013-07-25) Grema, Alhaji Shehu; Cao, YiIn this paper, static and dynamic optimization of a reservoir waterflooding process for enhanced oil recovery was studied. The dynamic optimization was achieved using receding horizon (RH) algorithms. Two forms of RH which are movingend and fixed-end RH were formulated and compared. MATLAB Reservoir Simulator (MRST) from SINTEF was used for reservoir simulation. The objective function to be maximized is net present value (NPV) of the venture while the control variable is water injection rate. Sequential quadratic programming (SQP) was applied for the optimization. It was found out that fixed-end RH gave the highest NPV with improvements of 0.81% and 1.49% over static and moving-end RH strategies respectivelyItem Open Access Optimization of Reservoir Waterflooding(Cranfield University, 2014-10) Grema, Alhaji Shehu; Cao, YiWaterflooding is a common type of oil recovery techniques where water is pumped into the reservoir for increased productivity. Reservoir states change with time, as such, different injection and production settings will be required to lead the process to optimal operation which is actually a dynamic optimization problem. This could be solved through optimal control techniques which traditionally can only provide an open-loop solution. However, this solution is not appropriate for reservoir production due to numerous uncertain properties involved. Models that are updated through the current industrial practice of ‘history matching’ may fail to predict reality correctly and therefore, solutions based on history-matched models may be suboptimal or non-optimal at all. Due to its ability in counteracting the effects uncertainties, direct feedback control has been proposed recently for optimal waterflooding operations. In this work, two feedback approaches were developed for waterflooding process optimization. The first approach is based on the principle of receding horizon control (RHC) while the second is a new dynamic optimization method developed from the technique of self-optimizing control (SOC). For the SOC methodology, appropriate controlled variables (CVs) as combinations of measurement histories and manipulated variables are first derived through regression based on simulation data obtained from a nominal model. Then the optimal feedback control law was represented as a linear function of measurement histories from the CVs obtained. Based on simulation studies, the RHC approach was found to be very sensitive to uncertainties when the nominal model differed significantly from the conceived real reservoir. The SOC methodology on the other hand, was shown to achieve an operational profit with only 2% worse than the true optimal control, but 30% better than the open-loop optimal control under the same uncertainties. The simplicity of the developed SOC approach coupled with its robustness to handle uncertainties proved its potentials to real industrial applications.Item Open Access Receding horizon control for oil reservoir waterflooding process(Taylor and Francis, 2017-10-02) Grema, Alhaji Shehu; Cao, YiWaterflooding is a recovery technique where water is pumped into an oil reservoir for increase in production. Changing reservoir states will require different injection and production settings for optimal operation which can be formulated as a dynamic optimization problem. This could be solved through optimal control techniques which traditionally can only provide an open-loop solution. However, this solution is sensitive to uncertainties which is inevitable to reservoirs. Direct feedback control has been proposed recently for optimal waterflooding operations with the aim to counteract the effects of reservoir uncertainties. In this work, a feedback approach based on the principle of receding horizon control (RHC) was developed for waterflooding process optimization. Application of RHC strategy to counteract the effect of uncertainties has yielded gains that vary from 0.14% to 19.22% over the traditional open-loop approach. The gain increases with introduction of more uncertainties into the configuration. The losses incurred as a result of the effect of feedback is in the range of 0.25%–15.21% in comparison to 0.39%–31.51% for the case of traditional open-loop control approach.