Browsing by Author "Diarra, Alhousseine"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    An agent-based model of farmer decision making: application to shared water resources in Arid and semi-arid regions
    (Elsevier, 2025-04-01) El Fartassi, Imane; Milne, Alice E.; Metcalfe, Helen; El Alami, Rafiq; Diarra, Alhousseine; Alonso-Chavez, Vasthi; Zawadzka, Joanna Ewa; Waine, Toby W.; Corstanje, Ron
    The study presents an agent-based modelling framework that integrates behavioural and biophysical models to investigate shared irrigation water management in an arid region. The behavioural model simulates farmers' decisions about their water irrigation sources (dam or groundwater) and whether to continue cultivating in the face of drought. This model was parameterised using survey data. The biophysical model component quantifies the impact of water availability and irrigation sources on soil salinity accumulation and its effects on crop productivity. Applied to the Al Haouz Basin, in Morocco, the integrated model reveals several key findings: (1) Increased groundwater access through water abstraction authorization can initially boost productivity but leads to widespread salinisation and farm abandonment, particularly under climate change scenarios. (2) Scenarios with reduced dam water availability demonstrate that mixed irrigation strategies mitigate short-term productivity losses but fail to prevent long-term soil salinity issues. (3) Land abandonment is significantly influenced by the level of water abstraction authorizations, with higher abstraction leading to more severe environmental degradation and social impacts. (4) Policy scenarios reveal that there is a theoretical optimal level of groundwater abstraction that maximises productivity while minimising land abandonment and salinity build-up. These results highlight the complex trade-offs between short-term gains and long-term sustainability, emphasising the need for holistic water governance policies that balance individual and collective interests.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Evidence of collaborative opportunities to ensure long-term sustainability in African farming
    (Elsevier, 2023-03-15) El Fartassi, Imane; Milne, Alice E.; El Alami, Rafiq; Rafiqi, Maryam; Hassall, Kirsty L.; Waine, Toby W.; Zawadzka, Joanna Ewa; Diarra, Alhousseine; Corstanje, Ron
    Farmers face the challenge of increasing production to feed a growing population and support livelihoods, whilst also improving the sustainability and resilience of cropping systems. Understanding the key factors that influence farming management practices is crucial for determining farmers' adaptive capacity and willingness to engage in cooperative strategies. To that end, we investigated management practices that farmers adopt and the factors underlying farmers' decision-making. We also aimed to identify the constraints that impede the adoption of strategies perceived to increase farming resilience and to explore how the acceleration of technology adoption through cooperation could ensure the long-term sustainability of farming. Surveys were distributed to farming stakeholders and professionals who worked across the contrasting environments of Morocco. We used descriptive statistics and analysis by log-linear modelling to predict the importance of factors influencing farmers’ decision-making. The results show that influencing factors tended to cluster around environmental pressures, crop characteristics and water availability with social drivers playing a lesser role. Subsidies were also found to be an important factor in decision-making. Farming stakeholders generally believed that collaborative networks are likely to facilitate the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices. We conclude that farmers need both economic incentives and technical support to enhance their adaptive capacity as this can lessen the socioeconomic vulnerability inherent in arid and semi-arid regions.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Trade-offs associated with changing cropping patterns in semi-arid areas of Morocco
    (Elsevier, 2025-06-01) El Fartassi, Imane; Milne, Alice E.; Oulaid, Bader; Bezrhoud, Youssef; Metcalfe, Helen; Alonso Chavez, Vasthi; Coleman, Kevin; Diarra, Alhousseine; El Alami, Rafiq; Prout, Jonah; Waine, Toby W.; Zawadzka, Joanna Ewa; Corstanje, Ronald
    We developed a model-based framework to support land-use and management decision-making. This framework integrates data and models to support an assessment of scenarios related to crop choices and irrigation management. The framework includes the IPCC models to describe nutrient losses, the Rothamsted carbon model to predict soil organic carbon and Cornel's Environmental Impact Quotient model to predict impacts from pesticides (fungicides, herbicides and insecticides). We used Monte Carlo simulations to quantify model uncertainties. Shaded arrays were used to communicate the uncertainties to end users of the framework. We parameterised our framework to explore outcomes for an irrigated agricultural area in a semi-arid region of Morocco. We used the framework to explore scenarios that were codesigned with farming stakeholders. The scenarios related to crop diversification, and to recent policies on the expansion of olive cultivation and the adoption of efficient irrigation technologies. For the outcomes considered (production, profitability, soil carbon, nutrient losses, pesticide impacts), there were clear trade-offs associated with the cropping system choice. Compared to the baseline scenario of rotated crops, olive production led to greater carbon sequestration (average 4 % increase by doubling olive production), reduced water use (average 3 % reduction by doubling olive production), and reduced emissions (average 42 % reduction by doubling olive production) but was less profitable and provided fewer edible calories. Additionally, olive cultivation was associated with higher environmental impacts from pesticides. Diversified systems, while less profitable, were associated with less harmful pesticide use. Drip irrigation was associated with positive outcomes for profit (average 23 % increase), water use (average 13 % reduction in water use), and reduced nitrogen leaching (average 40 % reduction) with negligible changes in other metrics. However, we did not account for factors associated with increased groundwater depletion. We conclude that such frameworks are a useful means for policy-stakeholders to explore the outcomes of their decisions, thereby, helping to minimise unintended consequences.