Browsing by Author "Davies, S."
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access Compositional analysis of excavated landfill samples and the determination of residual biogas potential of the organic fraction(Elsevier, 2016-06-08) Garcia, J.; Davies, S.; Villa, Raffaella; Gomes, D. M.; Coulon, Frederic; Wagland, Stuart ThomasThe objectives of this study were to assess the biogas potential of landfilled materials and to further validate the suitability of the enzymatic hydrolysis test EHT as a valuable alternative to substitute the standardised test currently in use (BMP). Both tests were applied to a range of landfill waste samples. The waste composition and volatile solids content (VS) profile together with the BMP test results showed that the biogas potential of the waste samples was directly related to their VS content, as expected. The positive correlation between the VS and the BMP test (r = 0.67) suggests that the first could be used as a primary indicator of biogas potential of waste samples. Nevertheless, it should be validated against the BMP test because, occasionally, the VS content does not equate to the biogas production. This was mainly due to the paper content of the samples which also correlates positively (r = 0.77) with the BMP biogas production. The EHT results showed a higher correlation with the BMP test (r = 0.91) than in previous studies which used a wider mixture of enzymes containing cellulase, hemicellulase and carbohydrase. This finding positions the EHT as a quick assessing method for the biodegradability of waste samples in future sample regimes.Item Open Access Evaluating leachate recirculation with cellulase addition to enhance waste biostabilisation and landfill gas production(Elsevier, 2016-07-05) Frank, R. R.; Davies, S.; Wagland, Stuart Thomas; Villa, Raffaella; Trois, C.; Coulon, FredericThe effect of leachate recirculation with cellulase augmentation on municipal solid waste (MSW) biostabilisation and landfill gas production was investigated using batch bioreactors to determine the optimal conditions of moisture content, temperature and nutrients. Experimentation was thereafter scaled-up in 7 L bioreactors. Three conditions were tested including (1) leachate recirculation only, (2) leachate recirculation with enzyme augmentation and (3) no leachate recirculation (control). Cumulative biogas production of the batch tests indicated that there was little difference between the leachate and control test conditions, producing on average 0.043 m3 biogas kg−1 waste. However the addition of cellulase at 15 × 106 U tonne−1 waste doubled the biogas production (0.074 m3 biogas kg−1 waste). Similar trend was observed with the bioreactors. Cellulase addition also resulted in the highest COD reduction in both the waste and the leachate samples (47% and 42% COD reduction, respectively). In both cases, the quantity of biogas produced was closer to the lower value of theoretical and data-based biogas prediction indicators (0.05–0.4 m3 biogas kg−1 waste). This was likely due to a high concentration of heavy metals present in the leachate, in particular Cr and Mn, which are known to be toxic to methanogens. The cost-benefit analysis (CBA) based on the settings of the study (cellulase concentration of 15 × 106 U tonne−1 waste) showed that leachate bioaugmentation using cellulase is economically viable, with a net benefit of approximately €12.1 million on a 5 Mt mixed waste landfill.