Papaioannou, GeorgiosHtike, ZawLin, ChenhuiSiampis, EfstathiosLongo, StefanoVelenis, Efstathios2022-08-112022-08-112022-07-11Papaioannou G, Htike Z, Lin C, et al., (2022) Multi-criteria evaluation for sorting motion planner alternatives, Sensors, Volume 22, Issue 14, July 2022, Article number 51771424-8220https://doi.org/10.3390/s22145177https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/18302Automated vehicles are expected to push towards the evolution of the mobility environment in the near future by increasing vehicle stability and decreasing commute time and vehicle fuel consumption. One of the main limitations they face is motion sickness (MS), which can put their wide impact at risk, as well as their acceptance by the public. In this direction, this paper presents the application of motion planning in order to minimise motion sickness in automated vehicles. Thus, an optimal control problem is formulated through which we seek the optimum velocity profile for a predefined road path for multiple fixed journey time (JT) solutions. In this way, a Pareto Front will be generated for the conflicting objectives of MS and JT. Despite the importance of optimising both of these, the optimum velocity profile should be selected after taking into consideration additional objectives. Therefore, as the optimal control is focused on the MS minimisation, a sorting algorithm is applied to seek the optimum solution among the pareto alternatives of the fixed time solutions. The aim is that this solution will correspond to the best velocity profile that also ensures the optimum compromise between motion comfort, safety and driving behaviour, energy efficiency, journey time and riding confidence.enAttribution 4.0 Internationalautomated vehiclesmotion planningsorting alternativesmotion sicknesssafetyenergy efficiencyjourney timeArticle