Installed nacelle aerodynamics at cruise and windmilling conditions
| dc.contributor.author | Sánchez-Moreno, Francisco | |
| dc.contributor.author | MacManus, David | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tejero, Fernando | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hueso Rebassa, Josep | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sheaf, Christopher T. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-16T09:46:08Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-07-16T09:46:08Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-07-11 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Purpose The decrease in specific thrust achieved by Ultra-High Bypass Ratio (UHBPR) aero-engines allows for a reduction in specific fuel consumption. However, the typical associated larger fan size might increase the nacelle drag, weight and the detrimental interference effects with the airframe. Consequently, the benefits from the new UHBPR aero-engine cycle may be eroded. This paper aims to evaluate the potential improvement in the aerodynamic performance of compact nacelles for installed aero-engine configuration. Design/methodology/approach Drooped and scarfed non-axisymmetric compact and conventional nacelle designs were down selected from a multi-point CFD-based optimisation. These were computationally assessed at a set of installation positions on a contemporary wide-body, twin-engine transonic aircraft. Both cruise and off-design conditions were evaluated. A thrust and drag accounting method was applied to evaluate different aircraft, powerplant and nacelle performance metrics. Findings The aircraft with the compact nacelle configuration installed at a typical installation position provided a reduction in aircraft cruise fuel consumption of 0.44% relative to the conventional architecture. However, at the same installation position, the compact design exhibits a large flow separation at windmilling conditions that is translated into an overall aircraft drag penalty of approximately 5.6% of the standard cruise net thrust. Additionally, the interference effects of a compact nacelle are more sensitive to deviations in mass flow capture ratio (MFCR) from the nominal windmilling diversion condition. Originality/value This work provides a comprehensive analysis of not only the performance but also the aerodynamics at an aircraft level of compact nacelles compared to conventional configurations for a range of installations positions at cruise. Additionally, the engine-airframe integration aerodynamics is assessed at an off-design windmilling condition which constitutes a key novelty of this paper. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Sánchez-Moreno F, MacManus D, Tejero F, et al., (2024) Installed nacelle aerodynamics at cruise and windmilling conditions. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, Available online 11 July 2024 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1748-8842 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1108/AEAT-03-2023-0070 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/22642 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Emerald | |
| dc.publisher.uri | https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/AEAT-03-2023-0070/full/html | |
| dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | en |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject | nacelle | |
| dc.subject | aerodynamics | |
| dc.subject | engine-airframe integration | |
| dc.subject | interference effects | |
| dc.subject | computational fluid dynamics | |
| dc.subject | windmilling | |
| dc.title | Installed nacelle aerodynamics at cruise and windmilling conditions | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dcterms.dateAccepted | 2024-04-25 |