Flood Disaster - The Role of Resources and Appraisal in Loss and Coping

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Muir, Helen
dc.contributor.author Quinn, Sarah L.
dc.date.accessioned 2013-03-01T09:59:11Z
dc.date.available 2013-03-01T09:59:11Z
dc.date.issued 2004-02
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/7839
dc.description.abstract Using the Conservation of Resources model by Hobfoll (1989,1998) and the Cognitive- Appraisal theory by Lazarus and Folkman (1984) this research sought to understand what role resources and appraisal had in a participant's experience of loss and coping in Northamptonshire or Yorkshire due to being flood affected. Samples from two UK floods, the Easter 1998 and Autumn 2000 events, were selected and twenty-four in-depth interviews, one case study and two focus groups were conducted using a qualitative methodological approach and one semi-qualitative questionnaire was developed and distributed to 250 properties. The research aimed to establish which authors work was more appropriate towards understanding an individual's experience of flooding and any subsequent loss or was it better to combine the two. Then to understand if a single resource could contain both an objective and a subjective component that could be lost as a result of a flood. If this last aim was supported, then two further objectives were to be investigated; If a single resource contained dual components, did the objective or subjective element of the loss have the greater impact upon the individual. Finally, if a single resource contained dual components, how did the individual cope with loss of the objective element compared to loss of the subjective element? This research concluded that it was more appropriate to combine both theories to provide a comprehensive understanding of flooding. The five resources categories, object, condition, personal characteristic, energy and social support all demonstrated to varying degrees a duality of loss, in that one resource could have both an objective and subjective element that could be lost. Both types of loss had an impact but subjective losses appeared to affect participants longer. Participants used problem-solving, emotion-focused and disengagement-focused coping activities but there was a weak pattern of loss to coping employed. en_UK
dc.language.iso en en_UK
dc.publisher Cranfield University en_UK
dc.rights © Cranfeld University 2004. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the copyright owner. en_UK
dc.title Flood Disaster - The Role of Resources and Appraisal in Loss and Coping en_UK
dc.type Thesis or dissertation en_UK
dc.type.qualificationlevel Doctoral en_UK
dc.type.qualificationname PhD en_UK


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search CERES


Browse

My Account

Statistics