The cost of a large-scale hollow fibre MBR

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Verrecht, Bart
dc.contributor.author Maere, Thomas
dc.contributor.author Ingmar, Nopens
dc.contributor.author Brepols, Christoph
dc.contributor.author Judd, Simon J.
dc.date.accessioned 2011-01-27T11:58:34Z
dc.date.available 2011-01-27T11:58:34Z
dc.date.issued 2010-10
dc.identifier.citation Bart Verrecht, Thomas Maere, Ingmar Nopens, Christoph Brepols and Simon Judd, The cost of a large-scale hollow fibre MBR, Water Research, Volume 44, Issue 18, October 2010, Pages 5274-5283 en_UK
dc.identifier.issn 0043-1354
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.06.054
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/4774
dc.description.abstract A cost sensitivity analysis was carried out for a full-scale hollow fibre membrane bioreactor to quantify the effect of design choices and operational parameters on cost. Different options were subjected to a long term dynamic influent profile and evaluated using ASM1 for effluent quality, aeration requirements and sludge production. The results were used to calculate a net present value (NPV), incorporating both capital expenditure (capex), based on costs obtained from equipment manufacturers and full-scale plants, and operating expenditure (opex), accounting for energy demand, sludge production and chemical cleaning costs. Results show that the amount of contingency built in to cope with changes in feedwater flow has a large impact on NPV. Deviation from a constant daily flow increases NPV as mean plant utilisation decreases. Conversely, adding a buffer tank reduces NPV, since less membrane surface is required when average plant utilisation increases. Membrane cost and lifetime is decisive in determining NPV: an increased membrane replacement interval from 5 to 10 years reduces NPV by 19%. Operation at higher SRT increases the NPV, since the reduced costs for sludge treatment are offset by correspondingly higher aeration costs at higher MLSS levels, though the analysis is very sensitive to sludge treatment costs. A higher sustainable flux demands greater membrane aeration, but the subsequent opex increase is offset by the reduced membrane area and the corresponding lower capex. en_UK
dc.language.iso en en_UK
dc.publisher Elsevier en_UK
dc.subject Membrane bioreactor en_UK
dc.subject Cost sensitivity en_UK
dc.subject Life cycle en_UK
dc.subject Biokinetics en_UK
dc.subject Aeration en_UK
dc.title The cost of a large-scale hollow fibre MBR en_UK
dc.type Article en_UK


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search CERES


Browse

My Account

Statistics