Exploring knowledge, perception of risk and biosecurity practices among researchers in the UK: a quantitative survey

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Shannon, Caitriona
dc.contributor.author Quinn, Claire H.
dc.contributor.author Sutcliffe, Chloe
dc.contributor.author Stebbing, Paul D.
dc.contributor.author Dally, Thomas
dc.contributor.author Glover, Anita
dc.contributor.author Dunn, Alison M.
dc.date.accessioned 2018-10-25T17:47:17Z
dc.date.available 2018-10-25T17:47:17Z
dc.date.issued 2018-09-08
dc.identifier.citation Caitriona Shannon, Claire H. Quinn, Chloe Sutcliffe, et al., Exploring knowledge, perception of risk and biosecurity practices among researchers in the UK: a quantitative survey. Biological Invasions, February 2019, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp. 303–314 en_UK
dc.identifier.issn 1387-3547
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1837-6
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/13572
dc.description.abstract Accidental introduction and/or spread of invasive non-native species (INNS) can result from a range of activities including agriculture, transport, trade and recreation. Researchers represent an important group of stakeholders who undertake activities in the field that could potentially facilitate the spread of INNS. Biosecurity is key to preventing the introduction and spread of INNS. Risk perceptions are a fundamental component in determining behaviour, so understanding how researchers perceive the risks associated with their activities can help us understand some of the drivers of biosecurity behaviour in the field. The aim of this study was to investigate researchers’ perceptions of risk in relation to their field activities and whether risk perceptions influenced behaviour. We gathered quantitative data on perceptions of risk and biosecurity practices using an online questionnaire. Only 35% of all respondents considered their field activities to pose some risk in terms of spreading INNS. Higher risk perception was found in those who undertook high risk activities or where INNS were known/expected to be present. However, whilst respondents with experience of INNS were more likely to report consciously employing biosecurity in the field, this did not translate into better actual biosecurity practices. Awareness of biosecurity campaigns did in fact increase perception of risk, perceived and actual biosecurity behaviour. However, there remains a disconnect between reported and actual biosecurity practices, including a lack of understanding about what constitutes good biosecurity practice. These findings should be used to improve targeted awareness raising campaigns and help create directed training on biosecurity practices. en_UK
dc.language.iso en en_UK
dc.publisher Springer en_UK
dc.rights Attribution 4.0 International *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ *
dc.subject Biosecurity practices en_UK
dc.subject Invasive alien species en_UK
dc.subject Human behaviour en_UK
dc.subject Fieldwork en_UK
dc.subject Invasive non-native species en_UK
dc.subject Research en_UK
dc.subject Risk perception en_UK
dc.title Exploring knowledge, perception of risk and biosecurity practices among researchers in the UK: a quantitative survey en_UK
dc.type Article en_UK


Files in this item

The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International

Search CERES


Browse

My Account

Statistics