An assessment of different extraction and quantification methods of penta- and hexa-chlorobenzene from SRF fly-ash

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Balampanis, Dimitris E.
dc.contributor.author Coulon, Frederic
dc.contributor.author Simms, Nigel
dc.contributor.author Longhurst, Philip J.
dc.contributor.author Pollard, Simon J. T.
dc.contributor.author Fenech, Cecilia
dc.contributor.author Villa, Raffaella
dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-07T09:19:09Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-07T09:19:09Z
dc.date.issued 2017-01-26
dc.identifier.citation Dimitris E. Balampanis, Frédéric Coulon, Nigel Simms, Philip Longhurst, Simon J.T. Pollard, Cecilia Fenech, Raffaella Villa, An assessment of different extraction and quantification methods of penta- and hexa-chlorobenzene from SRF fly-ash, Analytical Chemistry Research, Volume 12, June 2017, Pages 28-33 en_UK
dc.identifier.issn 2214-1812
dc.identifier.uri http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancr.2017.01.003
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/11753
dc.description.abstract Highly chlorinated benzenes, produced in the presence of organic matter and chlorine, are considered PCDD/Fs precursors, and are used as cost and time convenient substitute indicators for the indirect measurement of the latter. In this study penta- and hexa-chlorobenzene are quantified for the determination of the organochloride load of fly ash from solid recovered fuel incineration. Some of the chlorobenzenes are formed under ‘de novo’ conditions, through heterogeneous (ash particles/flue gases) reactions and are therefore deeply incorporated within fly ash. Accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) and ultrasonic solvent extraction (USE), along with the equivalent clean-up methods suggested by literature were compared to traditional Soxhlet. The extraction efficiencies achieved were 83 ± 7.5% for Soxhlet, 111 ± 19% for PFE, and 67 ± 17% for ultrasonication. Soxhlet extraction and clean-up through a multilayer silica gel column gave more precise results compared to the other sample preparation methods. Furthermore, performance comparison of gas chromatography fitted with either a mass spectrometer operated in single ion monitoring mode (GC-MS-SIM), or electron capture detector (GC- ECD) highlighted that ECD can be used for measuring chlorobenzenes traces down to 0.21 ng g−1, when the equivalent LOQ for MS-SIM was 3.26 ng g−1. The results further suggest that ECD can provide better peak integration than MS-SIM in the detection of chlorobenzenes in fly ash extracts, due to the detector's sensitivity to halogenated compounds. en_UK
dc.language.iso en en_UK
dc.publisher Elsevier en_UK
dc.rights Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. Information: Non-Commercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. No Derivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
dc.subject Organic halogens en_UK
dc.subject Solvent extraction en_UK
dc.subject Energy from waste en_UK
dc.subject SRF en_UK
dc.subject MBT en_UK
dc.title An assessment of different extraction and quantification methods of penta- and hexa-chlorobenzene from SRF fly-ash en_UK
dc.type Article en_UK


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search CERES


Browse

My Account

Statistics