Improved analysis of GW150914 using a fully spin-precessing waveform model

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Abbott, B. P.
dc.contributor.author Davies, G. S.
dc.contributor.author LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration
dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-05T14:37:45Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-05T14:37:45Z
dc.date.issued 2016-06
dc.identifier.citation Abbott BP, et al., (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration). (2016) Improved analysis of GW150914 using a fully spin-precessing waveform model. Physical Reviews X, Volume 6, Issue 4, October - December 2016, Article number 041014 en_UK
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/11724
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.6.041014
dc.description.abstract This paper presents updated estimates of source parameters for GW150914, a binary black-hole coalescence event detected by the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) in 2015 [Abbott et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016).]. Abbott et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 241102 (2016).] presented parameter estimation of the source using a 13-dimensional, phenomenological precessing-spin model (precessing IMRPhenom) and an 11-dimensional nonprecessing effective-one-body (EOB) model calibrated to numerical-relativity simulations, which forces spin alignment (nonprecessing EOBNR). Here, we present new results that include a 15-dimensional precessing-spin waveform model (precessing EOBNR) developed within the EOB formalism. We find good agreement with the parameters estimated previously [Abbott et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 241102 (2016).], and we quote updated component masses of 35 + 5 − 3 M ⊙ and 3 0 + 3 − 4 M ⊙ (where errors correspond to 90% symmetric credible intervals). We also present slightly tighter constraints on the dimensionless spin magnitudes of the two black holes, with a primary spin estimate < 0.65 and a secondary spin estimate < 0.75 at 90% probability. Abbott et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 241102 (2016).] estimated the systematic parameter-extraction errors due to waveform-model uncertainty by combining the posterior probability densities of precessing IMRPhenom and nonprecessing EOBNR. Here, we find that the two precessing-spin models are in closer agreement, suggesting that these systematic errors are smaller than previously quoted. en_UK
dc.publisher American Physical Society en_UK
dc.rights Attribution 3.0 International
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
dc.title Improved analysis of GW150914 using a fully spin-precessing waveform model en_UK
dc.type Article en_UK


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 3.0 International Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 3.0 International

Search CERES


Browse

My Account

Statistics