Assessment of soil organic carbon at local scale with spiked NIR calibrations: effects of selection and extra-weighting on the spiking subset

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Guerrero, C.
dc.contributor.author Stenberg, B.
dc.contributor.author Wetterlind, J.
dc.contributor.author Viscarra Rossel, R. A.
dc.contributor.author Maestre, F. T.
dc.contributor.author Mouazen, Abdul Mounem
dc.contributor.author Zornoza, R.
dc.contributor.author Ruiz-Sinoga, J. D.
dc.contributor.author Kuang, Boyan Y.
dc.date.accessioned 2016-10-24T14:34:34Z
dc.date.available 2016-10-24T14:34:34Z
dc.date.issued 2014-01-17
dc.identifier.citation Guerrero, C. et al. (2014) Assessment of soil organic carbon at local scale with spiked NIR calibrations: effects of selection and extra-weighting on the spiking subset. European Journal of Soil Science, Volume 65, Issue 2, pp. 248-263 en_UK
dc.identifier.issn 1351-0754
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12129
dc.identifier.uri https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/10850
dc.description.abstract Spiking is a useful approach to improve the accuracy of regional or national calibrations when they are used to predict at local scales. To do this, a small subset of local samples (spiking subset) is added to recalibrate the initial calibration. If the spiking subset is small in comparison with the size of the initial calibration set, then it could have little noticeable effect and a small improvement can be expected. For these reasons, we hypothesized that the accuracy of the spiked calibrations can be improved when the spiking subset is extra-weighted. We also hypothesized that the spiking subset selection and the initial calibration size could affect the accuracy of the recalibrated models. To test these hypotheses, we evaluated different strategies to select the best spiking subset, with and without extra-weighting, to spike three different-sized initial calibrations. These calibrations were used to predict the soil organic carbon (SOC) content in samples from four target sites. Our results confirmed that spiking improved the prediction accuracy of the initial calibrations, with any differences depending on the spiking subset used. The best results were obtained when the spiking subset contained local samples evenly distributed in the spectral space, regardless of the initial calibration's characteristics. The accuracy was improved significantly when the spiking subset was extra-weighted. For medium- and large-sized initial calibrations, the improvement from extra-weighting was larger than that caused by the increase in spiking subset size. Similar accuracies were obtained using small- and large-sized calibrations, suggesting that incipient spectral libraries could be useful if the spiking subset is properly selected and extra-weighted. When small-sized spiking subsets were used, the predictions were more accurate than those obtained with ‘geographically-local’ models. Overall, our results indicate that we can minimize the efforts needed to use near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy effectively for SOC assessment at local scales. en_UK
dc.language.iso en en_UK
dc.publisher Wiley en_UK
dc.rights This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article: Guerrero, C. et al. (2014) Assessment of soil organic carbon at local scale with spiked NIR calibrations: effects of selection and extra-weighting on the spiking subset, European Journal of Soil Science, Vol. 65, Iss. 2, pp. 248-263, which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12129. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. http://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-828039.html#submitted en_UK
dc.title Assessment of soil organic carbon at local scale with spiked NIR calibrations: effects of selection and extra-weighting on the spiking subset en_UK
dc.type Article en_UK


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search CERES


Browse

My Account

Statistics