What has 25 years of P/OM research taught us about productivity

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Neely, Andrew
dc.date.accessioned 2006-04-25T14:29:24Z
dc.date.available 2006-04-25T14:29:24Z
dc.date.issued 2005
dc.identifier.citation Neely, A. (2005) What has 25 years of P/OM research taught us about productivity. EurOMA 12th Annual Conference, Budapest, 19-22 June 2005 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1826/1041
dc.description.abstract Achieving productivity growth that is both sustained and sustainable is clearly a concern of Governments across the world, yet what has 25-years of research in production and operations management taught us about productivity and to what extent have these lessons been incorporated into mainstream public policy debates. Using data gathered during a meta-analysis of papers published during the last 25 years in the International Journal of Operations and Production Management (IJOPM), the Journal of Operations Management (JOM) and the International Journal of Production Economics (IJPE) this paper argues that the P/OM community has largely failed to engage with the policy community, not because the research undertaken by the P/OM community is irrelevant to the policy community, but because the P/OM community has failed to capitalize on its relevance. Using a framework based on the OMA model – opportunity, motivation and ability - we explore the reasons why this is the case for individual P/OM scholars and the community as a whole. en
dc.format.extent 103431 bytes
dc.format.extent 11560 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Decision Sciences Institute, Atlanta, Georgia en
dc.title What has 25 years of P/OM research taught us about productivity en
dc.type Conference paper en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search CERES


Browse

My Account

Statistics